Giving Compass
  • Sign In
  • About Us
    About Giving Compass How We Choose Content and Organizations Annual Reflections Our Newsletter
  • Getting Started
  • Learn About Issues
    Topic Guides
    Animal Welfare COVID-19 Criminal Justice Democracy Disaster Relief Education Environment Health Homelessness Immigrants and Refugees Racial Equity Women and Girls
    Curated Articles
    Partner Collections Giving Compass Selections See All Articles
  • Give to Causes
    Issue Funds & Intermediaries Projects Nonprofits
  • Get Involved
    Philanthropy Resource Directory Events Volunteer Opportunities
  • Partner With Us
    Nonprofits Authors Use Our Content Services Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Sign Up
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Sign In

Collective Impact: Understanding the Basics

National Council of Nonprofits Jun 12, 2018
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
collective impact
  •  Share
  •  Save
  • 8 shares
Share

Giving Compass’ Take:

• The National Council of Nonprofits gives us an overview of “collective impact” — working together, sharing info and resources to solve a complex problem — and explains why it’s so important in philanthropy.

• The inclusion of community voices is emphasized, which is something that organizations involved in collective approaches should always be aware of. Shared vision is also a top priority.

• Here’s an example on how collective impact can help work toward lowering rates of rural infant deaths.


“Collective impact” describes an intentional way of working together and sharing information for the purpose of solving a complex problem. Proponents of collective impact believe that the approach is more likely to solve complex problems than if a single nonprofit were to approach the same problem(s) on its own. While collective impact seems very similar to plain old “collaboration,” there are certain characteristics that distinguish collective impact initiatives – and make them successful.

What is the “Collective Impact” Framework?

In a collective impact initiative the participants are often a combination of individuals, organizations, grantmakers, and even representatives from the business community and government. According to Hanleybrown, Kania, and Kramer, the following characteristics are present in a collective impact initiative: (but some other important characteristics, such as the inclusion of community voice, as noted in this article, are critical too.)

The participants share a vision of change and a commitment to solve a problem by coordinating their work; they agree on shared goals.

Participants also agree to measure or monitor many of the same things, so that they can learn across the initiative, and hold each other accountable.

To be most effective, the activities of all the participants are coordinated by a “backbone,” which could be a single organization, a single person, or a steering committee that represents all the participants. The backbone is often most responsible for “building public will” and making sure that the initiative stays focused and moves forward. The backbone also focuses on building a culture that encourages information sharing and candor, and doesn’t shirk from resolving conflicts so that trusted relationships emerge among the participants. Typically the backbone plays an administrative role such as convening meetings, coordinating data collection, connecting participants with each other, and facilitating the activities of the initiative, and the relationships, so that working together the participants can get past barriers, and are efficient and productive. The backbone may also facilitate or attract financial resources to the collective impact initiative.

Activities of the initiative are described as “mutually reinforcing” because they are designed to remind all participants that they depend on each other to move the initiative forward. Mutually reinforcing activites ensure that the activities of the participants are aligned; directed towards shared measurement; and are making progress towards common goal(s).
Finally, a successful collective impact initiative depends on resources to keep it going, and consistent and open communication between all the participants, so that everyone is informed and stays motivated over time.

Read the full article about collective impact at National Council of Nonprofits.

  •  Share
  •  Save
Share

Impact Philanthropy is a complex topic, and others found these selections from the Impact Giving archive from Giving Compass to be good resources.

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Accountability Needed In Education Philanthropy

    Giving Compass' Take: • Citing the example of Mark Zuckerberg and Corey Booker's efforts to revitalize the Newark school system with mixed results, Education Next's Frederick Hess discusses the importance of reformers putting funders' feet to the fire, making sure actions match words. • The accountability discussed in this piece goes both ways, so it's worth looking at how nonprofits use metrics to back up investments in the education sector. Are we looking closely at our own impact? • Here's more about how bringing philanthropy to education can often be a struggle. Ultimately, donors and foundation staff don’t have to answer to anybody besides themselves. They’re free to interpret their experiences however they like. This is why they can come across as unaccountable and smitten with their own wisdom. But it’s also good to keep things in perspective. If you’re bitterly angry at someone who’s voluntarily giving away large sums of money, you probably need to take a deep breath. Most foundation staff spend a lot of time talking to people they fund, people they might fund, or people trying to woo them. They spend every day talking about their mission, how to refine it, and how to execute it, and they do this mostly with people who want their money. Given all that, it’s easy to wind up in a self-assured, mission-driven bubble. It takes money to do things. Programs, staff, research, advocacy, and pretty much everything else that happens in school reform requires funding. This gives funders oceans of influence. Yet this influence is accompanied by a sea of quirks that rarely get examined or discussed. Reformers should change that. They should talk openly about the influence of funders and expect that foundations be at least as answerable for their actions as they’d like educators to be. Read the full article about accountability in education philanthropy by Frederick Hess at Education Next.


Are you ready to give?

Collective Impact is an important topic. Other members found these Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations and Projects aggregated by Giving Compass to be relevant to individuals with a passion for Collective Impact.

Loading...
Learn More
Connect

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
Take Action

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
More from
Giving Compass
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Transitioning from COVID-19 Relief to Long-term Resilience
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    A Socially Responsible Investment Fund to Finance Justice
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    38 Social Entrepreneurs to Watch for in 2021
Follow Us
Newsletter

Become a newsletter subscriber to stay up-to-date on the latest Giving Compass news.

About Us
  • About Giving Compass
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Content at Giving Compass
  • Partner With Us
Trending Issues
  • Environment
  • Homelessness
  • STEM Education
  • Equal Pay Act
  • Gender Equality

Copyright © 2021, Giving Compass, LLC

•
  • Privacy Policy
  • User Agreement

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.