Giving Compass
  • Sign In
  • About Us
    About Giving Compass How We Choose Content and Organizations Annual Reflections Our Newsletter
  • Getting Started
  • Learn About Issues
    Topic Guides
    Animal Welfare COVID-19 Criminal Justice Democracy Disaster Relief Education Environment Health Homelessness Immigrants and Refugees Racial Equity Women and Girls
    Curated Articles
    Partner Collections Giving Compass Selections See All Articles
  • Give to Causes
    Issue Funds & Intermediaries Projects Nonprofits
  • Get Involved
    Philanthropy Resource Directory Events Volunteer Opportunities
  • Partner With Us
    Nonprofits Authors Use Our Content Services Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Sign Up
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Sign In

How Might We Better Help Welfare Recipients?

Social Programs That Work Jan 8, 2019
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
How Effective is the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP)? Giving Compass
  •  Share
  •  Save
Share

Giving Compass’ Take:

• This paper from Social Programs That Work details The Minnesota Family Investment Program, which gave welfare recipients that found jobs a 20 percent cash supplement to offset work-related expenses.

• The results of the pilot were promising, but it was implemented more than 20 years ago. Would the same results apply in today’s political and economic environment?

• Here’s why welfare reform is worth the risk.


The Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP) was implemented as a pilot program in seven urban and rural counties from 1994 to 1998 and served as an alternative to the federal welfare program (Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC).

Program: A welfare-to-work program that combines mandatory participation in employment and training services with earnings supplements for participants who do find work.

Evaluation Methods: A well-conducted randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a sample of 11,473 families in seven Minnesota counties whose welfare status ranged from long-term welfare recipients to new welfare applicants.

Key Findings: Sizable increase in employment and earnings, and reduction in poverty, for single-parent, long-term welfare recipients (but not for other welfare recipients or applicants).

Other: A limitation of the evidence is that this study was conducted prior to full implementation of the major 1996 federal welfare reform act, and it is unknown whether the findings would generalize to present-day welfare settings.

Read the full article on the Minnesota Family Investment Program at Social Programs That Work.

  •  Share
  •  Save
Share

If you are looking for more articles and resources for Impact Philanthropy, take a look at these Giving Compass selections related to impact giving and Impact Philanthropy.

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Feedback as the Bedrock of Political Action and Social Change

    Studying world politics, I am exposed to many political scientists’ esoteric explanations of why certain systems of governance functioned better than others. Yet there must be something – some underlying principle – that held the “good” governments together. I didn’t find it in my textbooks. No, the success of our democracy began with nothing other than the protection of the people’s voice. Empowering constituents by hearing their feedback. A profoundly simple yet complicated concept: successful democracy must be born from listening rather than just leading. Regardless of which end you may sit on the political spectrum, most citizens of our country feel grateful for a government that was built on the idea of constituent feedback. But, it is very easy to take for granted. As part of a generation fortunate enough to be born into a constituent-centered democracy that existed long before our entrance into it, I took the concept of feedback as a given. As it turns out, a few autocratic case studies along with a couple clicks further into any world news site had me quickly understanding that this privilege is anything BUT inherent when it comes to governance across the world. Feedback at an institutional level takes work. Work that is born at the hands of thoughtful individuals that understand that recognizing people’s needs starts and ends with dialogue. With a new appreciation for constituent feedback I began to see feedback’s capacity for governmental good. It is quite easy to make sense of feedback in the simplest of settings, like student surveys or asking your newest employee how they felt about their onboarding experience. But harnessing the power of closed feedback loops in government? That is enough to ignite real, tangible change in constituent relationships, closing the gap between decision-makers and those who decisions are made FOR. Although feedback can often be overlooked as an intuitive part of democracy, it is crucial that public servants and citizens alike recognize that feedback loops must be continuously protected and promoted in order for virtuous cycles of American democracy to persist. Read the full article about feedback by Cait O’Connell at FeedbackLabs.


Looking for a way to get involved?

A good way to complement your interest in Advocacy and Policy is to connect with others. Check out these events, galas, conferences or volunteering opportunities related to Advocacy and Policy.

Loading...
Learn More

Are you ready to give?

Advocacy and Policy is an important topic. Other members found these Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations and Projects aggregated by Giving Compass to be relevant to individuals with a passion for Advocacy and Policy.

Loading...
Learn More
Connect

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
Take Action

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
More from
Giving Compass
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    A Look at Nevada’s Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment Program
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Food Stamp Work Requirements Would Force States to Provide Job Training
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    How Effective is the Portland JOBS Training Program?
Follow Us
Newsletter

Become a newsletter subscriber to stay up-to-date on the latest Giving Compass news.

About Us
  • About Giving Compass
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Content at Giving Compass
  • Partner With Us
Trending Issues
  • Environment
  • Homelessness
  • STEM Education
  • Equal Pay Act
  • Gender Equality

Copyright © 2021, Giving Compass, LLC

•
  • Privacy Policy
  • User Agreement

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.