Giving Compass
  • Sign In
  • About Us
    About Giving Compass How We Choose Content and Organizations Annual Reflections Our Newsletter
  • Getting Started
  • Learn About Issues
    Topic Guides
    Animal Welfare COVID-19 Criminal Justice Democracy Disaster Relief Education Environment Health Homelessness Immigrants and Refugees Racial Equity Women and Girls
    Curated Articles
    Partner Collections Giving Compass Selections See All Articles
  • Give to Causes
    Issue Funds & Intermediaries Projects Nonprofits
  • Get Involved
    Philanthropy Resource Directory Events Volunteer Opportunities
  • Partner With Us
    Nonprofits Authors Use Our Content Services Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Sign Up
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Sign In

How to Drive Systems Change Work With Data

The Rockefeller Foundation Jun 27, 2019
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
How to Drive Systems Change Work With Data Giving Compass
  •  Share
  •  Save
Share

Giving Compass’ Take:

• The Rockefeller Foundation co-hosted Innovative Frontiers of Development, where they gathered insight on how to achieve systems change through data-driven practices. 

• How are you approaching systems change in your philanthropy? Is data driving your decision-making? 

• Read more about the roots of philanthropic systems change. 


Earlier this month, my colleague Matthew Bishop and I co-hosted a wonderful group of thinkers and doers at The Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center in Italy. We explored the Innovative Frontiers of Development with a focus on achieving 21st Century Systems change. The ideas flowed through plenary sessions debating our biggest political challenges and in smaller breakout groups shaping specific 30-day deliverables and projects.

This year I’ve been quite focused on the application of data science to realize the Foundation’s vision. With that lens, I heard notes throughout our Bellagio discussions relating to data. They helped me see how data can help overcome many challenges in systems change work. In particular, I saw the importance of data-driven approaches to increasing clarity, adaptation, and innovation in systems change efforts.


Since you are interested in Impact Philanthropy, have you read these selections from Giving Compass related to impact giving and Impact Philanthropy?

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Advancing Investments in Evidence-Based Early Childhood Programs in New Hampshire

    Giving Compass Take: · Lynn A Karoly discusses how New Hampshire has fallen short in providing for early childhood education needs for the state and how the state can be strategic in planning to address these needs with evidence-based education. · What steps does New Hampshire need to take to provide better early childhood education?   · Read more about investing in early childhood education. New Hampshire is often hailed as a state where children’s well-being is high relative to other states. However, a 2017 RAND study pointed to the substantial share of children in the state who are at risk of adverse developmental outcomes because of low family resources and other factors that can compromise healthy development in the first few years of life. Further, available funding streams—primarily federal funds—for early childhood interventions such as Early Head Start, Head Start, and home visiting through the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program are not sufficient to reach all New Hampshire children and families who could benefit. The RAND study also estimated that New Hampshire would gain from further investments in two types of evidence-based early childhood interventions: home visiting and preschool education, with estimated returns of $2 to $6 in benefits for every $1 invested. Despite this potential return, New Hampshire has fallen behind other states that have recognized the value of further investments in early childhood programs. The state’s contribution to home visiting is modest, and New Hampshire is one of seven states that does not use state dollars to fund preschool, either through public schools or private programs. Given the unmet need and potential for positive economic returns, the RAND Corporation was asked to identify ways that New Hampshire can be strategic in making new early childhood investments, with a focus on evidence-based home visiting and high-quality preschool. RAND researchers assembled data across communities in the state (defined by school districts) to understand the variation in the factors that place children and families at risk and where publicly funded early childhood programs are currently available. Recognizing the limitations of the available community-level data, in-depth information was also collected for four communities—Claremont, Manchester, Nashua, and Coös County—to understand local implementation of early childhood programs, including innovative strategies and challenges. Analyses of the indicators and focal community experiences support recommendations for strategic investments in evidence-based early childhood programs in New Hampshire. Read the full article about investing in early childhood education by Lynn A. Karoly at RAND Corporation.


Clarity by seeking measurable goals

Those advocating data-driven approaches for systems change often chant “if you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it” only to be rejoined by those dismissive of such approaches with “what matters can’t always be measured”. What really matters in systems change efforts is that people mobilize to common goals, or at least they understand each other’s goals.

Adaptation through monitoring and learning 

No one fully understands a system or can predict how it will change. We are all crossing the river one stone at a time. Having a data-driven strategy allows you to be specific in what you’re trying to achieve. You can then more frequently and precisely test and improve your approach. You can take more risk with your strategy because you have broken your plans into more manageable and measurable steps, allowing for course corrections before it’s too late.

Innovation from outside our current frame

The traditional approach to big scale change efforts is to create a logic model based on a few hypotheses. We then invest in data gathering and monitoring based on those hypotheses.

Read the full article about driving systems change with data by Zia Khan at The Rockefeller Foundation. 

  •  Share
  •  Save
Share

Are you ready to give?

In addition to learning and connecting with others, taking action is a key step towards becoming an impact giver. If you are interested in giving with impact for Impact Philanthropy take a look at these Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations or Projects.

Loading...
Learn More
Connect

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
Take Action

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
More from
Giving Compass
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    How Some Grantmakers Make Life Harder for Nonprofits
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    How an XQ Super School Flopped
  • This is a Giving Compass SelectionThis article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    How to Judge Nonprofit Effectiveness
Follow Us
Newsletter

Become a newsletter subscriber to stay up-to-date on the latest Giving Compass news.

About Us
  • About Giving Compass
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Content at Giving Compass
  • Partner With Us
Trending Issues
  • Environment
  • Homelessness
  • STEM Education
  • Equal Pay Act
  • Gender Equality

Copyright © 2021, Giving Compass, LLC

•
  • Privacy Policy
  • User Agreement

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.