Giving Compass
  • Sign In
  • About Us
    About Giving Compass How We Choose Content and Organizations Annual Reflections Our Newsletter
  • Getting Started
  • Learn About Issues
    Topic Guides
    Animal Welfare COVID-19 Criminal Justice Democracy Disaster Relief Education Environment Health Homelessness Immigrants and Refugees Racial Equity Women and Girls
    Curated Articles
    Partner Collections Giving Compass Selections See All Articles
  • Give to Causes
    Issue Funds & Intermediaries Projects Nonprofits
  • Get Involved
    Philanthropy Resource Directory Events Volunteer Opportunities
  • Partner With Us
    Nonprofits Authors Use Our Content Services Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Sign Up
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Sign In

What Exactly is a Voting Method? And Does Our Current One Need to Go?

The Center for Election Science Jul 15, 2019
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
What Exactly is a Voting Method? And Does Our Current One Need to Go?
  •  Share
  •  Save
  • 56 shares
Share

Part two of a multi-part series. Read parts one and three.


There is a lot of momentum behind reforming our democracy right now. From dark money to gerrymandering to the national popular vote, Americans are questioning the way our democracy functions, and they’re looking for answers. But as I mentioned in part one of this series, there’s another reform that is incredibly simple and often overlooked: the voting method. But what exactly is a voting method?

Although I often meet people who tell me they don’t know what a voting method is, they actually do. And so do you. The voting method is simply the way that we select the winner of an election.

And we select that winner by looking at three key pieces of information:

  1. What kind of data about the candidate(s) can you provide on your ballot?
  2. How is that data analyzed?
  3. How many winners are there, and what process is used to determine those winners?

These three pieces of information determine the type of voting method you’re using, and the way that it helps you select a winner. Change one piece and you have a different method.

And potentially an entirely different result. Which is why voting methods matter.


Since you are interested in Civil Society, have you read these selections from Giving Compass related to impact giving and Civil Society?

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Foundations Can Scale Solutions for the SDGs

    Giving Compass' Take: • The author shares insights into how funders can alter their behaviors to orient grantees toward the Sustainable Development Goals and scale solutions.  • How will focusing on the grantee/grantmakers relationship help with scaling impact?  • Read about strategies for scaling up social programs for nonprofits.  Scaling Solutions Toward Shifting Systems, seeks to offer some concrete recommendations and catalyze a conversation about how to change the SDG industry with an eye toward scale. The report outlined five key ways that funders could change their behaviors: 1. Shift the power dynamics. Funders tend to have significantly more power in these relationships, which can put pressure on grantees to conform to foundation priorities and limit their ability to do systems-oriented change. Foundations need to be more cognizant of power dynamics and look to adopt practices that provide grantees with more flexibility to determine their own needs. 2. Look beyond financial support. If funders and grantees have strong relationships built on trust, they can have ongoing conversations that allow foundations to better understand needs and help identify and provide nonmonetary support. 3. Build a knowledge base. Systems change requires big thinking and identifying all the relevant actors within a system. Foundations can both help map those systems and connect grantees with other actors within the system. 4. Work together to ease the burden. Funders should collaborate more often to share insights and information about grantees and consider establishing joint assessment and due diligence processes to limit the burden on grantees. 5. Change the way they give. Perhaps most critically, the report says, foundations have to change the way they give money. If the goal is systemic change, restrictive one-year grant cycles are not the way to achieve big goals. Read the full article about how foundations can scale solutions by Adva Saldinger at Devex 


Let’s take the results of the 2016 election. Donald Trump was elected as President of the United States using our current voting method—plurality voting. But what would have happened if we changed the voting method?

Luckily, we studied that election, so we have a pretty good idea.

What we found was that when voters used different alternative voting methods, Donald Trump wasn’t the winner. In fact, Hilary Clinton wins the race using any other voting method we studied. And when we include candidates who didn’t run in the general election, such as Bernie Sanders, we find that the results again change. Clinton wins using some voting methods, while Sanders wins with others. And these results align with voters’ honest feelings about candidates—not just who they’d vote for, which can often be a strategic decision.

So, why are the results so different when we use other voting methods?

Because our current voting method—plurality voting—forces you to only select one candidate you support. And that leads to all sorts of negative effects, including the spoiler effect, more partisan winners, and a system that discourages good, but “less electable,” candidates from running in the first place.

But as I mentioned in part one of this series, we can change the way we vote. And in recent years, we’ve seen a spike in the number of activists and funders working on initiatives to do just that. Private foundations and Mainers hungry for change poured over $1 million into an effort to see ranked-choice voting adopted in Maine, while other funders focused on getting approval voting adopted in Fargo, North Dakota. We’ve also seen a group of grassroots activists nearly pass an initiative to implement a voting method called STAR voting in Lane County, Oregon.

Each of these voting methods has its strengths and weaknesses. In the next part of our series, we’ll dig into a few of the voting methods being pursued right now, and how you can objectively evaluate those methods to decide if it’s the right solution to advocate for in your community.

_______

Original Contribution by Kirsten Elliott, Director of Philanthropy at The Center for Election Science. 

  •  Share
  •  Save
Share

Looking for a way to get involved?

If you are interested in Civil Society, please see these relevant events, training, conferences or volunteering opportunities the Giving Compass team recommends.

Loading...
Learn More

Are you ready to give?

If you are interested in Civil Society, please see these relevant Issue Funds, Charitable Organizations or Projects where you can get involved.

Loading...
Learn More
Connect

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
Take Action

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
More from
Giving Compass
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Ranked Choice Voting Gains Traction For 2020
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Approval Voting: Coming to a City Near You
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Approval Voting: A Possible Fix for Polarized U.S. Politics
Follow Us
Newsletter

Become a newsletter subscriber to stay up-to-date on the latest Giving Compass news.

About Us
  • About Giving Compass
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Content at Giving Compass
  • Partner With Us
Trending Issues
  • Environment
  • Homelessness
  • STEM Education
  • Equal Pay Act
  • Gender Equality

Copyright © 2021, Giving Compass, LLC

•
  • Privacy Policy
  • User Agreement

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.